Oh where have I been?

I am back. I would apologize for my long absence, but given the lack of any feedback, I do not think anybody cares. Oh well, I have returned in any event. Let me get right back to it. I was reading last week that Heidi Fleiss, former Hollywood Madam and purveyor of flesh for Charlie Sheen, is hooking up in some joint venture type of arrangement with a Nevada brothel owner. Now, keep in mind, prostitution is legal in Nevada (now to combine that with the polygamy in Utah and you would have one fun state). Her idea is to have a "stud" ranch where she would market/manage male prostitutes for female customers.

It boggles my mind, though. Other than the OLD SNL skit (Dan Aydroyd) Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute, which was very funny because it hit the reality on the head, what is the point. Do women NEED to pay to get some? I mean, if the woman in question is decent looking enough (or wealthy enough) all she has to do is go into public and put out the "I just want to get laid" vibe and she would pretty much have her choice of most guys looking to just fuck.

Then I was thinking, that if she is going to cater to the meesekite, fat or infirmed chick market, how is the guy going to be able to perform. I guess the cost of Viagara, Cialis or Levitra will be a tax deductible expense. It makes sense on the surface and then it just runs into a wall. It does not seem to be a good idea. Again, if a woman is just looking for some companionship, she could do better with a male escort and that could lead to sex for her, at an extra charge, if she so desires. I just do not see a woman feeling the need to head to the brothel to find somebody willing to give her head.

There may be some women who take advantage of such a situation, but will it really be enough to carry the overhead of this venture. I do not see it, but what do I know. I just think that though it would be "fair" for women to have this service, I am not sure they "need" it. The old fashioned methods to get off should work well. Then again, if you pay directly, I guess you would expect (rightly so) to orgasm. If that is the case, I think that a vibrator may be more cost effective, but it does not do much for the human touch.

I am now rambling, but the point is that it does not seem to be slam dunk money maker in my humble opinion. I could be wrong! So, let me ask you all, how have things been going while I was too busy to sit and write? Let me know. Ciao for now!